By Jacqueline Mills, World Animal Protection
In 2013, World Animal Protection commissioned the first report into the ways in which animal attachment could be used to increase the disaster resilience of vulnerable communities in Australia (Thompson et al. 2014a). This addressed a call in the National Strategy for Disaster Resilience for greater emphasis on community engagement and a better understanding of the diversity, needs, strengths and vulnerabilities within communities (Councils of Australian Governments 2011).
The report was prompted by an emerging body of evidence demonstrating that the bond between humans and their animals can influence human behaviour in disasters. This can be both a risk and an asset: people can put themselves at risk to save animals in disasters, but conversely, people can be encouraged to plan for animals ahead of disasters. The latter scenario can aid resilience by encouraging people to take steps to secure their own safety as well as that of their animals ahead of disasters.
The report investigated the potential of drawing on the human-animal bond to encourage disaster preparedness among vulnerable groups of people for whom traditional community engagement strategies may have met with limited success to date.
To determine the ways in which animal attachment could be leveraged to increase the disaster resilience of vulnerable groups, the researchers needed to understand what makes these groups vulnerable and how animals figure in their lives.
To address this, a team of academic experts searched English language academic and lay literature from October to December 2013. They conducted a review of the literature in relation to seven vulnerable groups identified in the then Standing Council on Police and Emergency Management forward work plan on disaster resilience. These groups were Indigenous Australians, culturally and linguistically diverse communities (CALD), children and youth, older people, people with disabilities, the homeless, and people with mental health issues (Communiqué 4–5 July 2013).
Attachment theory was used to conceptualise the importance of the human-animal bond. This theory assumes that individuals seek proximity to an “attachment figure” (Bowlby 1999 in Thompson et al. 2014b). There are four criteria an attachment figure is thought to fulfil:
Attachment theory was found to be relevant for investigation of the human-animal bond for vulnerable groups, with the role of animals in people’s lives ranging from provision of companionship and security, to warmth, and practical service in the case of seeing-eye dogs. Despite the researchers finding that there was a sound evidence base recognising the psychological, emotional, health, wellbeing and practical benefits that animals provide to the vulnerable, they found there had been no systematic investigation to date of the impact of animals on the disaster resilience of those in the community who have been identified as vulnerable.
In disaster situations where there is a risk of losing the attachment figure, attachment strategies come into play. Where the figure is an animal such as a pet, the person will seek to reinforce the above criteria by, for example, seeking to be close to the animal or refusing to abandon an animal even in the face of danger to the person. In disaster situations, this might mean that ‘people may be reluctant to evacuate without their animals’ or they may ‘decline emergency accommodation if their animal is unwelcome’ (Thompson et al. 2014a).
The literature also demonstrated that animal attachment is critical during disaster recovery. If animals are lost this can negatively impact recovery and result in significant trauma and stress. A strong relationship with an animal following a disaster can aid recovery.
Based on these findings, the report made 25 recommendations for government, emergency services, and animal owners.
The main recommendations for government to consider included:
Additional recommendations for government to consider included:
Recommendations for animal owners to consider included:
Recommendations for emergency services personnel to consider training in:
Recommendations for disaster resilience information and engagement strategies:
Recommendations for evacuation shelters to consider:
The report concluded that a focus on animals and animal attachment is a unique approach that may be successful in increasing the engagement of vulnerable groups in disaster resilience community strategies. Further, because animal lives are interwoven with human lives, the benefits of increasing the resilience of vulnerable communities through animal attachment is twofold: ‘human and animal lives can be saved together’ (Thompson et al. 2014a).
The report, Animal attachment and disaster resilience in vulnerable communities in Australia/A literature review, can be obtained from World Animal Protection.
Bowlby 1999, Attachment: Attachment and loss, 2nd edition, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA
Councils of Australian Governments 2011, National Strategy for Disaster Resilience.
Mikulincer & Shaver 2007, The attachment behavioural system: Basic concepts and principles, in Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics and Change, The Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 3–28.
Standing Council on Police and Emergency Management 2013, Communiqué 4–5 July 2013.
Thompson K, Every D, Rainbird S, Cornell V, Smith B & Trigg J 2014a, Animal attachment and disaster resilience in vulnerable communities in Australia / A literature review, prepared for World Animal Protection.
Thompson K, Every D, Rainbird S, Cornell V, Smith B & Trigg J 2014b, No pet or their person left behind: Increasing the disaster resilience of vulnerable groups through animal attachment, activities and networks, Animals, 4, pp. 214–240.